Think about a conflict between two cultures anywhere in the world. What is the conflict? Who is involved? What does each side believe about the other side that fuels the conflict?
Agenda
Quick overview of British Cultural studies
Collect index card assignments
Group discussion of questions
Overview of Ideological Theory
Discussion of index cards
Last time we were discussing culture as power
Those with power structure communication to maintain and support their power
Those who conform succeed
But power can be resisted
Today we discuss approaches to such resistance
One such approach is British Cultural Studies
Culture is politics; media support the politics of culture
Culture as the generation and circulation of meaning in industrial societies
explicitly presumes that meaning may be generated and circulated differently in nonindustrial societies
explicitly focuses on the political rather than the aesthetic or humanist
culture is
a way of living with an industrial society that encompasses all of the meanings of that social experience
Meaning ... Is linked to social structure
Capitalist societies are divided societies
a complex network of groups
based on class, gender, race, nation, age group, religion, occupation, education, politics, etc
each with divergent interests
each with a distinctive relationship with the "dominant classes"
Note in this that culture is described in terms of social divisions and divergent interests
All cultures encompass such divisions
All cultures entail competition between divergent interests
All cultures serve the interests of some better than others
Social power is getting one's interests served by the social structure as a whole
Here British cultural theory takes an ideological turn
class struggle is the contest for social power
Power, it claims, is a struggle for meaning
The goal of power is to naturalize meanings that preserve and enhance power
The primary tool of social power is the naturalization of meaning
Naturalization is the process of making a particular set of social relations seem normal or natural
This naturalization of meaning is generally unintentional
It is simply a byproduct of expressing belief
given the reality of human "attribution"
If we are successful, we credit ourselves
If we are unsuccessful, we credit the situation
If someone else is successful, we credit the situation
If someone else is unsuccessful, we credit them
Groups that are not dominant do the same thing
Success reflects the rightness of the beliefs and actions of those in power
Group success within the context of dominance speaks to the rightness of its approach
Failure reflects specific lacks in those who fail
rather than "oppression" of the dominant class
All too often, we oppress ourselves by accepting naturalized meanings
Culture is, by definition, ideology
Group discussion
What is the structure of power at Foxwoods? How does the tribe that owns the casino naturalize some meanings in preference to others? How do those meanings privilege American Indians? How do those meaning privilege middle class white America? Who is "oppressed" and how?
What was the structure of power for the author of learning to see? What does she naturalize/normalize? How does she become conscious of the gulf between her perceptions and reality? How does she bridge that gulf?
What questions did you bring that extend these themes. Discuss.
Index card assignment due Thursday
Think back on a moment when you encountered your cultural background (any part of your cultural background) in a memorable way. What culture did you encounter. What happened? What made the event memorable?
Unless otherwise noted, the contents of this page
were written by participants on the Media Space Wiki, operated by Davis Foulger,
and should be cited accordingly. For example (APA): Foulger, D. and other
participants. (August 27, 2008). Intercultural Spr2006 Sess06. MediaSpaceWiki. Retrieved on from
http://evolutionarymedia.com/wiki.htm?InterculturalSpr2006Sess06.