Think about a leadership experience you have had in a group or organization. Describe the experience. What kind of leadership did you exert? Note that there are many ways in which we can exert leadership.
Note
For those who haven't been paying attention. The second short paper is due on Monday, Apr 10.
Reminder
No class on Friday
Returning Midterm
12 point curve. Average grade is a B-. 5 A variants; 10 B variants; 7 C variants; 4 D variants.
Leadership
Leadership is not a set of traits
It is a set of perceptions
An organizational leader is often made by the perceptions of other leaders
A leader is made by the perceptions of followers
It is a set of skills
Practice matters, and those who practice early and often have an advantage
Types of leadership
Transformational/evangelical leadership
creating a vision
motivating and reenforcing belief
storytelling
why shared context (sports, for instance) matters
Leadership is one of the most commonly discussed "success" themes in business
It emerges from the obvious
Some people rise to high positions and big incomes
And others don't
Those that rise naturally assume there was a reason
Normal attribution suggests that it has to be
positive
laudable
and inherent to their character
Those that don't rise assume they could have done something differently
Normal attribution suggests that it has to be
Situational
Learnable
Once again, leadership
From these attributions we get two different views of leadership
That leadership is an expression of character
the "trait" approach (leaders are better)
A theme in hundreds of books that litter bookstores
leadership is a heritable (e.g. leaders are "born")
An excuse to promote heirs into leadership positions
Neither view has proved to have any basis
No character or personality variables are associated with leadership
Indeed, successful leaders often demonstrate the very worst character traits
Lying
Cheating
Stealing
Adultery
Abuse of power
Its enough to make you wish there were fewer "leaders"
That leadership is a skill
The "Stylistic" approach
The evidence is better here
There are a set of skills that seem to matter
task
relationship
technical
But the skills themselves don't decide who leads
Many people with excellent task, relational, and leadership skills never take on major leadership roles
Leadership is a structurational process
In which the desire to lead
buttressed, to some extent, by leadership skills
intersect with
The necessity of leadership
The skills required in a particular situation
And the willingness of a group to be led by someone
Leadership doesn't work unless all three issues converge on the same person
The necessity for leadership increases as tasks require
coordination of the parallel efforts associated with complex and time sensitive tasks
coordination across time of the serial efforts of specialists
there is contention for scarce resources
These conditions emerge from a chart we have viewed twice already:
Unless otherwise noted, the contents of this page
were written by participants on the Media Space Wiki, operated by Davis Foulger,
and should be cited accordingly. For example (APA): Foulger, D. and other
participants. (August 27, 2008). Organizational Spr2006 Sess26. MediaSpaceWiki. Retrieved on from
http://evolutionarymedia.com/wiki.htm?OrganizationalSpr2006Sess26.