MediaSpace Wiki | |
Communication of Emotion
Planalp, 39-70
Stewart, 74-82
- For some emotions, communicating how we feel is relatively easy.
- But there are many emotions
- not all are easy to communicate.
- We are often faced with the inexpressible:
- feelings we don't share
- based on experience we don't have in common.
- Exchanging messages is not the same as coordinating meaning.
- transmitted boxcars versus interwoven dialogues (message exchange)
- only machines simply send messages
- people remember what they've said (or a version thereof)
- understanding messages often requires understanding the person who composed it
- messages are never context free
- we create messages that approximate what we want to say
- and receive messages that approximate what was intended
- Communicating emotion is not the same as communicating emotionally
- the former is the substance or meaning of a message
- the latter is a property of a message
- both matter
- Key elements of emotional intelligence and emotional communication competence
- noticing emotion
- identifying it correctly (recognition)
- understanding it
- Responding appropriately
- Expressing appropriately
- Varieties of emotional connection
- Emotional Recognition -- recognizing that the other is feeling
- the appearance of color
- can be hard to interpret
- different people are better at both exhibiting and recognizing than others
- paying attention matters
- Emotional Accuracy -- recognizing what the other is feeling
- Filters matter. If disposed to the negative, we will more often see negative
- Repertoire matters. People with narrow expressive or recognition repertoire's will convert one to another.
- Role expectation matters. People will sometimes be unwilling to act in a particular way.
- Emotional Understanding -- recognizing how the other is feeling
- Full emotional understanding is difficult and unusual, as it assumes a lot of both participants
- and we don't need to fully understand everything to have a reasonable understanding
- precipitating events (objects, causes)
- appraisal
- physiological changes
- expression (action tendencies, action)
- regulation
- Partial understanding is more common
- how they feel
- why they feel that way
- what they are dealing with
- Our assumptions may not be valid
- one of the problems of assuming that semiotic understanding translates to similar phenomonological understandings
- our attributions tend to be selective and to observe the fundamental attribution error
- getting the emotion right isn't getting the intensity right
- even when we talk about emotions, it may take a while to get them right
- our emotions often change as we talk about them
- Emotional coincidence -- feeling along with the other
- Reacting with the same emotion at the same time
- We often seek out opportunities for emotional coincidence
- Emotional cantagion and empathy -- feeling as the other is feeling
- contagion - "catching" emotions from others
- a primitive in human behavior. Even babies do it
- empathy - taking on the emotions of another
- feeling with others
- is detached concern a "right" level of empathy?
- Sympathy -- feeling about the other's feelings
- Responding to the other's feeling's
Understanding and Listening
Stewart, 167-181, 191-205
Inhaling and Exhaling our communication (together)
- Four things we do whenever we communicate (participate in an episode) with other people
- identify the situation
- situations often offer up appropriate scripts for behavior
- closed episodes offer canned scripts
- rituals (greetings, religious services, cashier exchanges, talk in acquaintance level relationships, relationship rituals)
- open episodes
- no script, or at least an inobvious one
- freedom to act outside of script and expectation
- defined episodes
- episodes where one or another of the participants has an agenda
- often become competitive attempts to assert control
- to impose a particular script or theme
- scripts set an approximate trajectory in interaction
- and a set of likely outcomes, not all of the desireable
- example: a telephone call where a stranger knows your name
- define the person or people we are with
- anything they tell us tells us more than the content of their message
- our view of their personality and values
- our evaluation of them
- personal constructs, often organized in clusters (implicit-personality theory)
- physical (tall-short, fat-thin, beautiful-not)
- role (buyer-seller, boss-employee, adult-child)
- inteaction (friendly-not, polite-rude)
- psychological constructs (motivated-lazy, intelligent-dumb)
- a risk: creating self-fulfilling prophecies
- a risk: are first impressions best impressions?
- define ourselves relative to the other person (relationship) and the situation (role)
- what kind of a relationship do/should/could we had with each person
- how are we supposed to act given the situation and our role in it
- how are we supposed to act given our relationship to the other person
- adaptability is a key to social success
- and that doesn't mean we can't be true to who we are
- relationship labels set useful limits
- friend, acquaintance, close friend, coworker, best friend, brother, sister, work, significant other, partner, spouse
- situation and relationship prototypes set scriptlike expectations
- figure out why things unfold the way they do
- attribution
- the fundatmental attribution error
- personality bias toward others
- situational bias thoward self
- group bias (our group is better than not our group)
- cultural bias (stereotypes, bias toward favoring individual or community)
- why did they do that
- why did I do that
|
| -- Last edited August 27, 2008 Go
to Main Topic list |
Unless otherwise noted, the contents of this page
were written by participants on the Media Space Wiki, operated by Davis Foulger,
and should be cited accordingly. For example (APA):
Foulger, D. and other
participants. (August 27, 2008). Relationships And Communities Session Nine. MediaSpaceWiki. Retrieved on from
http://evolutionarymedia.com/wiki.htm?RelationshipsAndCommunitiesSessionNine.