Who talks to whom in a group or other social structure
"Links" or "Relationships"
Not just a "yes/no", but a "how much"
Reasons why network structures form
Propinquity
Who sits next to whom
Who lives near whom
Who works with whom
Relationships
Friendships
Partnerships
Alliances
Cliques
Tradition or requirements of the activity
Types of group structure
Decentralized
At extreme, everyone talks to everyone
An all channel network:
Risk: Communication Overload from too many messages
Practically speaking, this never happens
Our communication with others in a group is always unequal
Some people talk more than others
Even in groups, some messages are directed at individuals
Side Conversations
Group breakouts
Breaks and and pre and post meeting conversations
Interaction between meetings
Spatial arrangements predispose relationships and create power dynamics
The big issue is simply floor control
There usually isn't time for everyone to speak, especially as the group gets larger
We often solve this by delegating floor control to a discussion leader
Centralized
Any kind of group structure that restricts who can talk to whom
Even informally
Risk: communication underload
Disconnection from the group due to a lack of messages
The extreme here is a linear chain:
For which a circle is only a mild improvement:
What we see most often is an emergent network, of which the following is an example:
Notice, in this
Some people really are disconnected from the group: isolates
Most people focus their attention within subgroups: cliques
Some people only talk within their cliques
Some people are better connected to the whole group: liaisons
You can draw a picture like this to get a sense of your groups structure
Draw a picture of the space you are interacting in
Show where everybody is sitting
When one person talks to another, draw a line with an arrow between them
Note additional directed speech acts with a slash on the line
Create a "group" object on your drawing
When someone talks to the group, draw a line to the group object
Count those too
This is best done as an observer of a group.
Its hard to do when you are in the group.
You may wind up with a picture like this
This can be a useful way of figuring out what is happening in your group
Notice the effects of spatial relationships on this group
Note that Centralized versus decentralized is generally a matter of degree
And that it isn't always a conscious choice
But we do have some degree of choice
And we sometimes explicitly design network communication
Management chains and formal responsibility
Groupware structures
Workflows
When you can choose note that
Centralized groups may work more efficiently,
but are generally less satisfied
Decentralized groups entail a higher burden of relational communication
but the load is spread across the group
Membership changes make a hash of linkages
Such changes can be temporary
In which case the substitute may never integrate with the group
Or permanent
which probably entails some socialization
Which may mean some renegotiation
Spatial relationships help to structure linkages
Issues in spatial relationships
Territoriality
Personal Space
Conversational Distance
Issues in the separation distances we are comfortable with
Gender
Culture
Race
Age
Status
Relationship
Personality
How do the following spatial arrangements affect group communication?
Index Card Assignment due Thursday
Observe a group interacting. Draw a network diagram of who talks to who and how much. If you are a part of the group (not unlikely if you observe a group you eat lunch with), focus, as much as possible, on being an observer but draw yourself into the diagram, as it is likely that someone will ask you what you are doing and that you'll have to explain.
Unless otherwise noted, the contents of this page
were written by participants on the Media Space Wiki, operated by Davis Foulger,
and should be cited accordingly. For example (APA): Foulger, D. and other
participants. (August 27, 2008). Small Group Spring2006 Session08. MediaSpaceWiki. Retrieved on from
http://evolutionarymedia.com/wiki.htm?SmallGroupSpring2006Session08.